Sunday, January 23, 2005

iBank or LiquidLedger?

Been looking at what financial applications are available, and from what I can tell, LiquidLedger and iBank appear to be the best couple of financial applications around. They both openly advertise supporting OFX, which is a must in my opinion (automatic statement downloading is cool). Just not sure which of those two applications I should get. LiquidLedger doesn't have a trial period, so I can't really test it to see if I like it, though I'm leaning towards it over iBank. Anybody have experience with either applications?

2 Comments:

At 5:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Link, Josh Brown here. I currently use IBank and like it :) Not bad for a fairly inexpensive application. If used correctly, it generates nice reports.

Josh

 
At 12:07 AM, Blogger subpopculture said...

iBank doesn't sync with the OFX servers, and automatically update my ledger. That's a key feature for what I'm looking for. LiquidLedger seems to do that, but they don't have a trial up. And I'm not too keen on their license scheme: free upgrades until LiquidLedger 2. It seems Quicken 2005 came with my system, and it doesn't appear to be a demo or anything, so I may just use it. Though I do wish an application like Checkbook would support ledger population from OFX servers.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home